“National Aeronautics and Space Administration”
13+26+7+18+12+13+26+15 + 26+22+9+12+13+26+6+7+18+24+8 + 26+13+23 + 8+11+26+24+22 + 26+23+14+18+13+18+8+7+9+26+7+18+12+13 = 666
Gematria: The practice of coding numbers with words. Originated in Chaldea (Babylon), and later borrowed by the Occultist Pythagoras, and the Talmudic Jews. Now used by Freemasons across the plane in the media to leave their breadcrumb of clues and deceit.
The 33 Club
What Happened on the Moon?
Note: The creators of this video are not flat earthers, most likely because this is from the 1990s, and flat earth was almost non-existent back then. This is strictly for the Apollo lunar landings only.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels
“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.” – Adolf Hitler
“The American people don’t believe anything until they see it on television.” – Richard M. Nixon
For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. 3 Therefore whatsoever ye have spoken in darkness shall be heard in the light; and that which ye have spoken in the ear in closets shall be proclaimed upon the housetops.
How to Fake Weightlessness on ISS
Closing in on how the world’s “space” agencies fake 0 “gravity”…
Diamagnetic levitation. The scientific priesthood hides this property and promote the Paramagnetic properties that we are used to as the only properties of magnetism so that they can use this secret knowledge against us.
Watch this video and don’t be fooled again.
Parabolic Plane Flights
NASA (Nazi) Freemason Actor-NOTs* Busted, Again…
“We can’t go back to the moon, we don’t have that technology anymore, it’s been destroyed” – NASA Actornot Don Pettit
Stop Motion Back in the Day
NASA caught using Stop Motion Animation to keep up with the Soviet Space Program. Sad thing is, the Russian’s attempt looks even faker than ours. Which is to be expected. We have Hollywood style effects and budgets, everyone else just tries to emulate. And that’s obvious. How can the earth look so different from the Soviet perspective compared to ours? Bigger budget? Better sound stages?
The crispness of this spacewalk compared to today’s spacewalks is startling, to say the least. Modern spacewalks are done in pools, which is why the hazy look, despite having HD capabilities. But when you use toys and props on a smaller scale, things never look quite right.
Submarine vs ISS Hoax
The reality of work on a submarine versus the stories told to us by NASA.
CGI Snake by Chris Zabriskie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license:
A Compilation of Lies & Deceit
- Research Operation Paperclip, Operation Highjump, Operation Fishbowl, Operation Dominik, Operation Teapot, Operation Starfish Prime
The heavens declare the glory of YAHUAH; and the firmament shews his handywork.
Straight from the Snake’s Mouth
So let’s see what NASA has to really say about the shape and nature of earth. I was given this link by a friend of mine concerning the flat earth in relation with derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model. This is a report from the official NASA website:
Excerpt from page 6:
Excerpt from page 35:
“… a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.” – NASA 1987
I guess NASA forget to take this one off… Or did they…
It would make 0 sense for NASA to be creating a “simulated” experiment on “a stationary atmosphere over a flat non-rotating earth”, because if we do (we don’t) live on a spinning ball, with a spinning atmosphere, where in what reality or place would an experiment like this even be useful?? It wouldn’t. UNLESS, the earth IS a “stationary atmosphere over a flat, non-rotaing earth”. That’s why this document is SO important, because it proves NASA knows the earth is stationary and flat.
For those who do not understand aviation, this is for flight simulators. Many flight exams are held in flight simulators which allow pilots to fly IFR (instrument flight not visual flight) in order to practice various approaches and practice emergency procedures. They are used at all levels of training but are more valuable as pilots move into higher performance aircraft such as jets which would cost enormous amounts of money in fuel to practice all their training in the air. In the military this is even more crucial. It also serves practical safety. Obviously a real life crash would be devastating to people on the ground as well as to the life of the pilots. While aviation is the safest form of travel for the public, for pilots aviation is usually among the top three deadliest careers year by year. We ourselves know and have worked with 12 people who have died while working in aviation. You should check the references for this report. All aircraft are designed for linear flight. Sorry but there is no magic in the avionics or the design of an aircraft which would be used to navigate on a heliocentric rotating globe. In fact if this were the case the Wright brothers would never have gotten off the ground. Go take some flight lessons. You will use a basic plane with no fancy instruments. Then read this pdf on linear flight. You will understand what is being referenced. All airplanes are designed for linear flight over a flat non rotating earth.
These are more than just equations for a particular software flight simulator. There are apparently a standard set of equations, parameters in which all flight simulators are based, using equations of motion based on Newton’s 2nd Law for modeling aircraft motion in a fast-time simulation environment. The EOM are derived by first defining reference frames, determining the aircraft acceleration in an appropriate reference frame, and the dynamics are derived using Newton’s Second Law. The reference frame used is a flat, non-rotating Earth, therefore the reference frame is zero because there is no motion.
“As was noted in Chap. 1, the Earth is treated as flat and stationary in inertial space. These assumptions simplify the model enormously, and are quite acceptable for dealing with most problems of airplane flight. The effects of a round rotating Earth are treated at some length in Etkin (1972)”
“In this book the Earth is regarded as flat and stationary in inertial space. Any coordi- nate system, or frame of reference, attached to the Earth is therefore an inertial sys- tem, one in which Newton’s laws are valid. Clearly we shall need such a reference frame when we come to formulate the equations of motion of a flight vehicle.”
“There is one relevant steady state, however, that can be investigated with the lin- ear model, and that is horizontal flight in the boundary layer. The planetary boundary layer has characteristics quite similar to the classical flat-plate turbulent boundary layer of aerodynamics”
I would like to find Etkin (1972), much of the data in both papers are based this one.
And so simulators must represent real life conditions in order for the training to qualify as legally logged flight time. Anything less would represent a danger to the pilot and the public as his practice would not be based on reality. A simulator must represent accurately real conditions for practicing precision instrument approaches or emergency procedures, because the earth IS a stationary, enclosed, plane.
Satellites? Or Weather Balloons & Underwater Fiber Optic Cables…
Sometimes if you listen carefully, the people involved and “In the Know” will tip their hand and let you know some carefully held secrets. In this video, a 36 year NSA veteran inadvertently tells the listener that all cell and most other data is carried not by satellite but by fiber optic cables right here on earth – no satellites needed.
Official NASA Deputy Program Manager
Of Hubble Space Telescope Phone Call
Here is a phone call with the official NASA Deputy Program Manager of Hubble Space Telescope, regarding Hubble, SOPHIA, and Chandra Space Telescopes:
Sources used for the video and proving its validity:
All Space Telescopes Are on SOPHIA
A Special Purpose 747
From what I have gathered, satellites are definitely not what they have been taught to us as. And from what I can see through thorough investigation is they are either the same old balloon program since the early 1920s, or U-2 Dragonladies, or both. Is there any way to prove this?
Below is an interview from 2003 with Lieutenant Colonel Harold E. Mitchell from Space and Missiles Systems Center regarding the Corona Program from 1943-1974.
Excerpt from page 8:
Excerpt from page 10:
Excerpt from page 16:
Excerpt from page 11:
Excerpt from page 18:
Now take a look at this list of balloon launches from the SSC’s launch facility, Esrange Space Center official website. Scroll down slowly, paying attention to the Campaign and Payload columns, and ask yourself if you see anything familiar:
ELISA, ELISA 1, ELISA 2, and ELISA 3 are supposedly all satellites that were taken up by a rocket, according to NASA:
So what are they doing here on this “BALLOON LAUNCH LIST“?
104 | 1995-01-23 | 15:53:00 | SESAME | ELHYSA
113 | 1995-02-13 | 15:30:00 | SESAME | ELHYSA 2
121 | 1995-03-20 | 15:52:00 | SESAME | ELHYSA 3
140 | 1997-02-14 | 19:41:00 | ILAS VALIDATION 97 | ELHYSA
164 | 1998-08-10 | 19:41:00 | SABINE | ELHYSA
173 | 1999-01-18 | 16:26:00 | THESEO | ELHYSA 1
352 | 2004-03-11 | 18:28:00 | Envisat 3 | Elhysa
406 | 2009-08-02 | 17:57:00 | CNES | Elhysa
412 | 2009-08-26 | 19:03:00 | CNES | Elhysa
419 | 2010-04-04 | 17:24:00 | CNES | Opening Flight/Elhysa
420 | 2010-04-09 | 14:42:00 | CNES | Elhysa/Pico SDLA
434 | 2011-03-12 | 19:47:00 | CNES | Elhysa
And here’s MIR which were supposed to be modules taken up to the MIR Russian Space Station, and are now supposedly for the International Space Station. Supposedly taken up in the nose cones of rockets as well, but here they are on a “BALLOON LAUNCH LIST“…
190 | 1999-02-18 | 18:40:00 | THESEO | MIR
191 | 1999-02-19 | 14:43:00 | THESEO | MIR
194 | 1999-02-25 | 10:48:00 | THESEO | MIR
225 | 2000-02-18 | 16:22:00 | THESEO2000 | MIR
226 | 2000-02-18 | 18:14:00 | THESEO2000 | MIR
229 | 2000-02-27 | 13:40:20 | THESEO2000 | SUPPORT MIR
230 | 2000-02-29 | 15:43:00 | THESEO2000 | MIR
I would really like to know how it could even be remotely possible for a balloon to go up to the altitude of 255 miles at the speed of 17 148 mph. Hahaha! At least that’s what NASA claims the ISS is moving at:
And oh look there’s Enviast which according to ESA is a satellite not a balloon that went up in a rocket as well. Because why would they be lying to us right? But here it is on this “BALLOON LAUNCH LIST“, a balloon folks… a balloon!
329 | 2003-01-10 | 10:48:00 | Opening Flight | Envisat
330 | 2003-01-16 | 09:07:00 | Aerosol 2 | Envisat
331 | 2003-01-16 | 14:33:00 | ELHYSA | Envisat
332 | 2003-01-21 | 18:23:00 | SPIRALE | Envisat
333 | 2003-01-22 | 09:26:00 | Aerosol 3 | Envisat
334 | 2003-03-01 | 18:22:00 | AMON | Envisat
335 | 2003-03-04 | 12:55:07 | LPMA | Envisat
336 | 2003-03-06 | 06:02:27 | Triple | Envisat
337 | 2003-03-16 | 14:49:00 | Saoz/Bro | Envisat
338 | 2003-03-20 | 18:22:00 | MIPAS | Envisat
339 | 2003-03-23 | 14:28:00 | LPMA/CNRS | Envisat
340 | 2003-03-25 | 08:58:00 | Elite | Envisat
341 | 2003-03-30 | 15:32:00 | Saoz/Bro, Elite | Envisat
342 | 2003-03-31 | 23:45:00 | JPL | Envisat
346 | 2003-07-02 | 22:26:00 | MIPAS | Envisat
Here’s a real picture of Enviast in space:
Oh wait it’s just another terrible artist’s impression done in CGI, because that’s all we will ever get.
These are all names of satellites… satellites… on a balloon launch list from 1982-2016. A balloon launch list! I thought these were supposed to be in the nose cones of rockets? That’s not what this balloon list says. Millions and billions of taxpayer’s dollars for balloons… I guess all that helium must be expensive. Here are some videos of NASA and ESA putting up balloons:
Space and Missiles Systems Center
NASA Balloon Launch
(8 000 lbs Telescope Satellite)
On a Balloon…
Esrange Space Center Launches
NASA Antarctic Satellite Launch
On a Balloon…
I used a scientific approach to verify whether GPS satellites really exist in space or whether they are a virtual disguise for a terrestrial mast based navigation system. You’ll never guess what I found. One busted matrix. A Flat Earth Positioning System. I almost feel sorry for the sphere shills after this one, I’ve left them with nothing but tears for spheres… this sphere matrix is aimed ages 0-6 only kids…
Many of the technologies that we assume are space based, are in reality ground based systems. We’ve had the ability for a very long time to send messages across vast distances. We are not using space based equipment for the internet, nor for telecommunications, but we do use fiber optic and transatlantic cables, massive RF Towers, and bounce signals off of the atmosphere like with HAM radio signals. Space is fake, satellites are a hoax, and not what we are told they are. NASA is a fraud of the highest order.
If Red Bull is in on This Too, Who Else?
O YAHUAH, my strength, and my fortress, and my refuge in the day of affliction, the other people shall come unto you from the ends of the earth, and shall say, Surely our fathers have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit.
If you believe that you live on a spinning globe, think again. The spinning globe earth paradigm is a 500 years and running conspiracy perpetrated by the Jesuits, the Vatican, Kabbalahists, and the Freemasons. There is no observable curvature on earth and motion has never once been detected. NASA has never been passed “low earth orbit” and the moon landing was obviously staged. Once you understand the consequences of living on a stationary, enclosed, rectangular, plane, you’ll start to see why this information and knowledge is so important. Note, we are not the Flat Earth Society. They are controlled opposition to keep people away from flat earth Truth. This is a website with some of the best flat earth videos, documents, and documentaries on the internet. Unlike the Space & Universe channel with their phoney ISS live feed of earth from space, this website is jam-packed full of facts that provide flat earth proof. The flat earth is not a theory and it has not been debunked. Though we are forced to theorize on what an accurate map of the earth may look like, at least we don’t make wild claims such as earth is spinning ball, heliocentricism, gravity, and everything came from nothing.
Earth is a stationary, enclosed, rectangular plane, set on pillars just as it appears and just like our senses have always told us. NASA lies and is spearheading the campaign to deceive you and the rest of the world. Space X and other “aerospace” companies are a part of the deception, at least the owners and employees at the highest echelons. To clarify, not every scientist, pilot, school teacher or NASA employee is in on this ordeal. Don’t let these Occultists, fake space programs, and mainstream Scientism fool you. Think critically, logically, and do your own re-search before blindly believing that you live on a spinning, pear-shaped, oblate spheroid flying through an infinite black void of darkness and chaos that has never been proven.
This post is intended for the viewer to start asking questions!
Wake up, look up, and let your quest for Truth begin!
All credit is due to the realist community!
Thank you so much for all the research and hard work!
All glory and praise to EL ELYON YAHUAH ELOHIYM YAHUSHA HAMASHIACH!
Amein, and shalom!